The rescue vessel “Igor Belousov”,
currently under construction for the Russian Navy, is going to receive
autonomous underwater vehicles for rescue operations and deep-sea
research. Manned mini-submarines and unmanned vehicles occupy an
increasingly important place in the structure of the naval forces of
different countries of the world, and are used for both combat and
“humanitarian” missions. Such systems are able to significantly increase
the effectiveness of surface ships and submarines by means of providing
constant and careful control of the underwater space.
As
technology developed, underwater vehicles (originally created as a
means of studying the seabed) acquired much wider functions beyond
search-and-rescue works and carrying out special operations. The first
underwater robots appeared back in the 1950-1960s, but the real boom of
multi-functionality began at the turn of the century, when the
technological possibility to produce unmanned vehicles capable of
carrying out the most complex operations both without human
participation and with external control was achieved. Unmanned vehicles
have become a “magic wand” in situations, when the use of manned vessels
was too risky or technically impossible.
Underwater
robots can perform the following main functions without human
interaction: combat mine fields and other underwater obstacles; increase
the detection range of submarines’ hydro acoustic complexes; monitor
and repair underwater objects; and explore the relief of the seabed and
water mass. All this exceed the limits of military tasks. Such
capabilities are needed for both naval fleets and civil organizations.
Originally
underwater robots were too large to use them from conventional ships
and submarines. Special carriers were created for operating such
devices. Today they are still being used. For example, the SSN-23
nuclear submarine “Jimmy Carter” of the US Navy, which was put into
service in 2005. This submarine, initially designed as a standard
multi-purpose submarine of the Seawolf project, at the stage of
construction has undergone changes in order to make the use of
underwater robots possible.
Special underwater
vehicle carriers allotted to the Russian Navy provide wide possibilities
for working with large multipurpose systems, both unmanned and manned.
However, technical equipment miniaturization allows creating underwater
robots of the size of conventional torpedoes, sea mines, and even
smaller than that. Alongside supplying the appropriate interface
capabilities of the control system of a submarine, it allows for the use
of such vehicles from standard submarines.
Information
concerning Russia’s new and modernized submarine capabilities remains a
state secret. That is why it is difficult to estimate whether or not
the Russian Fleet is keeping up with its foreign rivals in this sphere.
However, as far as the non-restricted sphere is concerned –equipment for
the search and rescue service of the Navy with submersibles for various
purposes – it can be stated that although the Russian Navy still lags
behind the leading fleets of the Western countries, it fills up that
gap.
In previous years – in addition to the already
mentioned Igor Belousov, which will be equipped with an underwater robot
and two manned vehicles – the search-and-rescue service of the Navy
received several British-made autonomous “Panther” vehicles.
Russian
deep-water submersibles “Rus” and “Consul” – which are designed not
only for rescue operations, but also for deep-sea research – are
valuable acquisitions. Consul has successfully passed a diving test at a
depth of 6500 meters. According to experts and based on the design of
its solid sphere, it is capable of diving even deeper.
Consul
was built in Russia, while its predecessors – the “World” underwater
vehicles – were custom-built in Finland for the USSR. All the same, the
percentage of foreign components in Russian vehicles is high; in
particular electronics and precision mechanical units. Alas, the problem
cannot be solved by simply increasing the order for underwater
vehicles. In this case a well-functioning “general purpose” industry is
needed that should not be dependent exclusively on the defense complex.
Otherwise new high-tech productions may turn out to be hothouse plants
that will die in adverse climate change conditions, just the way it
happened to the greater part of the Soviet Union’s hi-tech military
technologiesafter 1991.
No comments:
Post a Comment